Greederboard
Official portrait of Josh Hawley

Josh Hawley

R Republican · Senator, Missouri
19
Low self-dealing
5/6 components have data
#115 of 193 scored

Public records indicate Josh Hawley's household does not trade individual stocks; his disclosures show concentration in mutual funds, a bank holding, and a real estate asset (Winecup Ranch), and he has been a lead sponsor of legislation (the PELOSI Act) to ban congressional stock trading. His estimated net worth rose from roughly $1.1 million around 2018 to roughly $2.8 million by 2025, a trajectory broadly consistent with Senate salary, book royalties, spousal income, and asset appreciation, though disclosure ranges make precise attribution impossible. Campaign and joint-fundraising committees drew large sums from donors including Smead Capital Management and, historically, David Humphreys of Tamko Building Products; any alignment between contributions and his votes is correlation, not evidence of a quid pro quo. A 2017 FEC complaint (MUR 7267) alleged improper "testing the waters" and vendor-coordination spending during his transition from a state campaign to a federal one, but no finding of personal-use enrichment was established in the sourced records reviewed. His spouse, Erin Morrow Hawley, is an appellate litigator with Alliance Defending Freedom and Lex Politica, raising commentary about issue conflicts but no documented lobbying of his office. Sourced data show no notable pattern of missed votes paired with heavy fundraising.

Public record

In Congress since
2019
Committees
Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
Small Business and Entrepreneurship
Judiciary
Missed votes, 119th Congress
4.0% (37 of 915; median member 1.9%)
Campaign money, 2025–26 cycle
$1.7M raised · 2% from PACs & committees · $856K cash on hand FEC ↗

The stock-trading ban

Senate cloture on H.R. 7008, Sep 30, 2026
Yes
Cosponsored a ban bill
S. 1498

H.R. 7008 bans new stock purchases by members, spouses and dependents; it doesn't force sales of existing holdings. The Senate vote was on the version paired with the SAVE Act, which is why no Democrat voted yes. Full breakdown →

Disclosed stock trades

No periodic transaction reports on file since 2024. That's the norm: most members don't trade individual stocks, or hold them in blind trusts and diversified funds.

Amounts are the ranges members must report, not exact values. The STOCK Act requires a report within 45 days of a trade; "late" counts days past that deadline, measured to the filing date.

How the score breaks down

Net-worth enrichment in office
15% weight
25
Estimated net worth rose from ~$1.1M (2018) to ~$2.8M (2025). Growth is broadly explainable by Senate salary, book royalties (The Tyranny of Big Tech), spousal legal income, and appreciation of a real estate holding rather than trading gains. Disclosure ranges prevent precise measurement; modest score reflects above-salary growth without an identified improper source.
Money → action alignmentcorrelation, not proof of any quid-pro-quo
20% weight
35
CORRELATION, NOT PROOF. Hawley's committees raised millions; notable donors include Smead Capital Management (top 2024 Victory Committee donor) and historically David Humphreys of Tamko Building Products, who gave millions. No quid-pro-quo asserted; sourced data does not establish systematic vote-for-money alignment in a single overseen sector.
Campaign-fund personal use
15% weight
20
A 2017 FEC complaint (MUR 7267) alleged improper 'testing the waters' spending and vendor-coordination as Hawley moved from a state campaign to a federal one; the sourced documents are the complaint itself, not a finding of personal enrichment. No documented personal-use diversion of campaign funds in reviewed records. Low confidence given limited outcome data.
Revolving door & family
15% weight
15
Spouse Erin Morrow Hawley is an appellate litigator with Alliance Defending Freedom and Lex Politica (Supreme Court/appellate practice). Commentary has noted potential issue conflicts (e.g., the mifepristone case), but reviewed sources show no registration as a lobbyist of his office or a documented family-lobbying-for-contracts pipeline tied to his Senate seat.
Skips the job to fundraiseno data
10% weight
—
Reviewed sources (GovTrack report card, OpenSecrets) did not yield an accessible missed-votes percentage paired with fundraising/paid-speech data establishing a pattern. Per rubric, absence of data is not penalized; scored zero with insufficient-data confidence.

Sources behind this score: 2 data aggregator · 4 news reporting · 3 official record · 5 reference database. Score = weighted average of the components that have data; the 1 without sourced evidence are excluded, never counted against the member. Methodology →

Embed this score on your site

Updates automatically when the score changes.

Right of reply

Is something here wrong or missing context? Members and their staff can send a correction or a statement. Statements are published on this page in full, and corrections go in the public log. Email corrections@greederboard.com.