Greederboard
Official portrait of Ron Johnson

Ron Johnson

R Republican · Senator, Wisconsin
39
Moderate self-dealing
3/6 components have data
#14 of 193 scored

Ron Johnson (R-WI), a senator since 2011, has no public record of active individual-stock day-trading under the STOCK Act; his wealth is concentrated in privately held businesses (notably the plastics firm Pacur), real estate, and funds rather than tracked equities, so stock-trading concerns are minimal. The strongest accountability question is conflict-of-interest: he successfully fought to expand the 2017 tax law's pass-through deduction to 23% (settled at 20%), a benefit he publicly acknowledged applied to his own Pacur LLC, and ProPublica reported the carve-out disproportionately benefited two billionaire families who were among his largest donors. His reported net worth grew substantially over his tenure (roughly $24M to ~$65M median by some accounts), though much of that traces to the 2020 sale of Pacur, a pre-office asset, complicating any "enrichment beyond salary" inference. His voting attendance (about 2.8% missed, at the Senate median) and available records show no notable campaign-personal-use or family-lobbying findings, so those components score low or insufficient-data.

Public record

In Congress since
2011
Committees
Budget (Chairman)
Finance
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
Senate Special Committee on Aging
Missed votes, 119th Congress
1.3% (12 of 915; median member 1.9%)
Campaign money, 2025–26 cycle
$1.1M raised · 3% from PACs & committees · $1.2M cash on hand FEC ↗

The stock-trading ban

Senate cloture on H.R. 7008, Sep 30, 2026
Yes
Cosponsored a ban bill
None

H.R. 7008 bans new stock purchases by members, spouses and dependents; it doesn't force sales of existing holdings. The Senate vote was on the version paired with the SAVE Act, which is why no Democrat voted yes. Full breakdown →

Disclosed stock trades

No periodic transaction reports on file since 2024. That's the norm: most members don't trade individual stocks, or hold them in blind trusts and diversified funds.

Amounts are the ranges members must report, not exact values. The STOCK Act requires a report within 45 days of a trade; "late" counts days past that deadline, measured to the filing date.

How the score breaks down

Stock self-tradingno data
25% weight
—
No public record of active individual-stock trading via STOCK Act periodic transaction reports. Congressional trade trackers (Quiver, MarketBeat) show no populated individual-equity trade history; his holdings are in private businesses, real estate, and funds rather than tracked single stocks. Per rubric, absence of trading scores 0, not penalized.
Net-worth enrichment in office
15% weight
35
Reported net worth grew markedly over his tenure (one analysis cites median wealth rising from ~$24M in 2011 to ~$64.9M), and OpenSecrets/press put 2018 net worth near $39M. However, the largest single jump traces to the 2020 sale of Pacur (a pre-office asset, sold for $5M-$25M) and longstanding rental income, which the rubric excludes from scoring as pre-office wealth. Moderate score reflects ambiguity, not a clear salary-beating gain attributable to office.
Money → action alignmentcorrelation, not proof of any quid-pro-quo
20% weight
58
Correlation, not proof. Johnson cast a key vote for the 2017 tax law only after pushing to expand the pass-through deduction (sought 23%, landed at 20%); ProPublica reported the carve-out especially benefited the Uihlein and Hendricks families, among his largest donors, and he acknowledged his own Pacur LLC benefited. He has also taken ~$753K from oil & gas over his career while opposing climate legislation. The pass-through episode is a documented vote-aligned-with-donor-and-personal-benefit pattern; oil & gas is a smaller, more diffuse correlation.
Campaign-fund personal useno data
15% weight
—
No documented findings of campaign or leadership-PAC funds spent on personal benefit. A 2015 dispute concerned deferred compensation Johnson received from Pacur after self-funding ~$9M of his 2010 campaign, but election-law experts said a pre-campaign agreement made it lawful; this is a personal-compensation question, not campaign-fund personal use. No FEC enforcement action found.
Revolving door & familyno data
15% weight
—
No specific public record found of Johnson family members lobbying tied to his office, office-linked contracts, or a notable staff-to-lobbyist pipeline. Absence of data; scored 0 per rubric (not penalized).
Skips the job to fundraise
10% weight
8
Strong attendance: Johnson missed 151 of 5,432 roll-call votes (2.8%) from 2011 to mid-2026, equal to the Senate median. No record of heavy paid-speech income displacing official duties. Low score reflects a clean attendance record.

Sources behind this score: 2 data aggregator · 4 news reporting · 3 reference database. Score = weighted average of the components that have data; the 3 without sourced evidence are excluded, never counted against the member. Methodology →

Embed this score on your site

Updates automatically when the score changes.

Right of reply

Is something here wrong or missing context? Members and their staff can send a correction or a statement. Statements are published on this page in full, and corrections go in the public log. Email corrections@greederboard.com.