Maxine Waters
Maxine Waters (D-CA), the senior Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee, does not report trading individual stocks, and STOCK Act trackers list no personal or spousal securities transactions, keeping her stock-trading exposure low. Her disclosed net worth (roughly $1-3 million, heavily tied to a long-held Los Angeles residence) shows no clear evidence of growth beyond ordinary real-estate appreciation, and historic wealth predates much of her tenure. As a senior member of the "big money" Financial Services Committee, Waters has long received financial-sector contributions; this represents a money-influence correlation only, not proof of quid pro quo. The most documented concern is campaign spending: FEC records show her campaign, Citizens for Waters, paid her daughter Karen Waters well over $1 million since 2003 for slate-mailer and consulting work, and in 2025 the committee agreed to a $68,000 FEC fine for accepting excessive contributions, prohibited cash disbursements, and reporting failures. She also missed about 6.7% of roll-call votes over her career, above the chamber median, though no evidence ties absences to paid speaking or fundraising. No evidence of personal-use embezzlement of campaign funds or a family-lobbying revolving door was found beyond the daughter's campaign-vendor payments.
Public record
- In Congress since
- 1991
- Committees
- Financial Services (Ranking Member)
- Missed votes, 119th Congress
- 4.5% (30 of 674; median member 1.9%)
- Campaign money, 2025–26 cycle
- $864K raised · 46% from PACs & committees · $270K cash on hand FEC ↗
The stock-trading ban
H.R. 7008 bans new stock purchases by members, spouses and dependents; it doesn't force sales of existing holdings. The Senate vote was on the version paired with the SAVE Act, which is why no Democrat voted yes. Full breakdown →
Disclosed stock trades
No periodic transaction reports on file since 2024. That's the norm: most members don't trade individual stocks, or hold them in blind trusts and diversified funds.
Amounts are the ranges members must report, not exact values. The STOCK Act requires a report within 45 days of a trade; "late" counts days past that deadline, measured to the filing date.
How the score breaks down
Sources behind this score: 3 data aggregator · 5 reference database · 5 news reporting. Score = weighted average of the components that have data; the 0 without sourced evidence are excluded, never counted against the member. Methodology →
Right of reply
Is something here wrong or missing context? Members and their staff can send a correction or a statement. Statements are published on this page in full, and corrections go in the public log. Email corrections@greederboard.com.