Greederboard
Official portrait of Angela D. Alsobrooks

Angela D. Alsobrooks

D Democrat · Senator, Maryland
9
Low self-dealing
3/6 components have data
#176 of 193 scored

Angela Alsobrooks (D-MD) entered the U.S. Senate in January 2025, giving her roughly an 18-month federal tenure as of mid-2026, which sharply limits the data available for several metrics. Her financial disclosure shows no individual-stock trading (trackers report ~$0 in publicly traded equities) and a modest estimated net worth around $558K, consisting mainly of a rental property, a state pension, and a bank account. Most documented controversies predate her Senate service and stem from her time as Prince George's County Executive: a 2024 CNN report that she improperly claimed homestead and senior-citizen property-tax exemptions (which she pledged to repay), and reporting that waste-management firms holding county contracts donated to her campaigns. An FEC complaint over county-funded ads benefiting her Senate run was dismissed in April 2025. Overall her federal record is short and shows no individual-stock conflicts; the notable items are pre-office, county-level matters reported in public records.

Public record

In Congress since
2025
Committees
Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs
Environment and Public Works
Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Senate Special Committee on Aging
Missed votes, 119th Congress
1.6% (15 of 915; median member 1.9%)
Campaign money, 2025–26 cycle
$1.8M raised · 24% from PACs & committees · $687K cash on hand FEC ↗

The stock-trading ban

Senate cloture on H.R. 7008, Sep 30, 2026
No
Cosponsored a ban bill
S. 1879 S. 5320

H.R. 7008 bans new stock purchases by members, spouses and dependents; it doesn't force sales of existing holdings. The Senate vote was on the version paired with the SAVE Act, which is why no Democrat voted yes. Full breakdown →

Disclosed stock trades

No periodic transaction reports on file since 2024. That's the norm: most members don't trade individual stocks, or hold them in blind trusts and diversified funds.

Amounts are the ranges members must report, not exact values. The STOCK Act requires a report within 45 days of a trade; "late" counts days past that deadline, measured to the filing date.

How the score breaks down

Stock self-trading
25% weight
0
No individual-stock trading. Disclosure shows up to $15K in a Bank of America account, up to $500K rental property, and a Maryland state pension; trackers report ~$0 in live-trackable publicly traded equities and no periodic transaction reports of stock trades.
Net-worth enrichment in officeno data
15% weight
—
Estimated net worth ~$558K (Sept 2025), ranking among the lower half of Congress. With only ~18 months in federal office and a single disclosure cycle, there is no measurable in-office growth beyond salary/market to assess. Pre-office wealth is not scored.
Money → action alignmentcorrelation, not proof of any quid-pro-quo
20% weight
22
CORRELATION, NOT PROOF. As county executive she received $54K+ from waste-management firms holding ~$325M in county trash contracts, with some donations timed near contract re-bids (no quid pro quo alleged; a contractor disputed receiving any perk). At the federal level her committees (Banking; HELP; EPW; Aging) align with donor sectors, but no specific vote-for-dollars pattern is yet documented in her short tenure.
Campaign-fund personal use
15% weight
8
No FEC finding of personal use of campaign funds. An FEC complaint alleged she used county public funds for ads benefiting her Senate campaign and that a state committee made fundraising disbursements aiding the federal race; the Commission dismissed the matter and closed the file in April 2025. Separately, she improperly claimed homestead/senior property-tax exemptions (a personal tax benefit, not campaign funds) and pledged repayment.
Revolving door & familyno data
15% weight
—
No public reporting found of family members lobbying tied to her office or a documented staff-to-lobbyist pipeline. Early-tenure staff turnover exists (e.g., a communications director departing April 2026) but no lobbying registrations linked to her office were identified in public records.
Skips the job to fundraiseno data
10% weight
—
No data found indicating a notable missed-vote record or heavy paid-speech/fundraising pattern conflicting with duties during her short first-term tenure. No reliable missed-votes statistic was available for scoring.

Sources behind this score: 2 data aggregator · 4 official record · 2 news reporting · 1 reference database. Score = weighted average of the components that have data; the 3 without sourced evidence are excluded, never counted against the member. Methodology →

Embed this score on your site

Updates automatically when the score changes.

Right of reply

Is something here wrong or missing context? Members and their staff can send a correction or a statement. Statements are published on this page in full, and corrections go in the public log. Email corrections@greederboard.com.