Angela D. Alsobrooks
Angela Alsobrooks (D-MD) entered the U.S. Senate in January 2025, giving her roughly an 18-month federal tenure as of mid-2026, which sharply limits the data available for several metrics. Her financial disclosure shows no individual-stock trading (trackers report ~$0 in publicly traded equities) and a modest estimated net worth around $558K, consisting mainly of a rental property, a state pension, and a bank account. Most documented controversies predate her Senate service and stem from her time as Prince George's County Executive: a 2024 CNN report that she improperly claimed homestead and senior-citizen property-tax exemptions (which she pledged to repay), and reporting that waste-management firms holding county contracts donated to her campaigns. An FEC complaint over county-funded ads benefiting her Senate run was dismissed in April 2025. Overall her federal record is short and shows no individual-stock conflicts; the notable items are pre-office, county-level matters reported in public records.
Public record
- In Congress since
- 2025
- Committees
- Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs
Environment and Public Works
Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Senate Special Committee on Aging - Missed votes, 119th Congress
- 1.6% (15 of 915; median member 1.9%)
- Campaign money, 2025–26 cycle
- $1.8M raised · 24% from PACs & committees · $687K cash on hand FEC ↗
The stock-trading ban
H.R. 7008 bans new stock purchases by members, spouses and dependents; it doesn't force sales of existing holdings. The Senate vote was on the version paired with the SAVE Act, which is why no Democrat voted yes. Full breakdown →
Disclosed stock trades
No periodic transaction reports on file since 2024. That's the norm: most members don't trade individual stocks, or hold them in blind trusts and diversified funds.
Amounts are the ranges members must report, not exact values. The STOCK Act requires a report within 45 days of a trade; "late" counts days past that deadline, measured to the filing date.
How the score breaks down
Sources behind this score: 2 data aggregator · 4 official record · 2 news reporting · 1 reference database. Score = weighted average of the components that have data; the 3 without sourced evidence are excluded, never counted against the member. Methodology →
Right of reply
Is something here wrong or missing context? Members and their staff can send a correction or a statement. Statements are published on this page in full, and corrections go in the public log. Email corrections@greederboard.com.