Greederboard
Official portrait of Betty McCollum

Betty McCollum

D Democrat · Representative, Minnesota 4th district
14
Low self-dealing
4/6 components have data
#144 of 193 scored

Betty McCollum (D-MN4), in office since 2001, presents one of the lowest-wealth, cleanest financial profiles in Congress: her disclosures show essentially no investment portfolio (an annuity and two home mortgages), no individual stock trading, and she co-sponsors the TRUST in Congress Act to ban member stock trading. Her voting attendance (about 1.9% missed over her career) is better than the chamber median, and no records of campaign-fund personal use, family lobbying, or a staff-to-lobbyist scandal were found. The one notable accountability signal is correlation-based, not evidence of wrongdoing: as the top Democrat on the House Defense Appropriations Subcommittee she receives concentrated defense-industry PAC money (roughly $64,000 in Q1 2026 alone). Overall this is a low-self-dealing record, with the modest money-influence score reflecting only the structural overlap between her committee gatekeeping role and defense donors.

Public record

In Congress since
2001
Committees
Appropriations
Missed votes, 119th Congress
1.2% (8 of 674; median member 1.9%)
Campaign money, 2025–26 cycle
$1.3M raised · 37% from PACs & committees · $499K cash on hand FEC ↗

The stock-trading ban

H.R. 7008 passage, Jul 22, 2026
No
Cosponsored a ban bill
H.R. 5106 H.R. 6731

H.R. 7008 bans new stock purchases by members, spouses and dependents; it doesn't force sales of existing holdings. The Senate vote was on the version paired with the SAVE Act, which is why no Democrat voted yes. Full breakdown →

Disclosed stock trades

No periodic transaction reports on file since 2024. That's the norm: most members don't trade individual stocks, or hold them in blind trusts and diversified funds.

Amounts are the ranges members must report, not exact values. The STOCK Act requires a report within 45 days of a trade; "late" counts days past that deadline, measured to the filing date.

How the score breaks down

Stock self-tradinghousehold / spouse
25% weight
0
No individual-stock trading found. Disclosures show only an annuity and home mortgages; no equity portfolio. She co-sponsors the TRUST in Congress Act to ban congressional stock trading. Score 0 per rubric (no individual-stock trading).
Net-worth enrichment in office
15% weight
5
Among the least wealthy members of Congress; estimated net worth has been near or below zero (estimated ~$32,000 in 2018), with liabilities (mortgages) exceeding reportable assets. No evidence of net-worth growth beyond salary/market over tenure; effectively no enrichment signal.
Money → action alignmentcorrelation, not proof of any quid-pro-quo
20% weight
42
CORRELATION, NOT PROOF. As ranking Democrat on the House Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, McCollum receives concentrated defense-industry PAC money (~$64,000 in Q1 2026 from Huntington Ingalls, Textron, SpaceX, Anduril, Kratos, Peraton, AM General, etc.) and advocates for Minnesota defense contracts. This reflects standard gatekeeper-donor alignment common to appropriators; no quid-pro-quo evidence.
Campaign-fund personal useno data
15% weight
—
No reports or FEC enforcement actions found alleging personal use of campaign or leadership-PAC (Betty PAC) funds. No data; not penalized per rubric.
Revolving door & familyno data
15% weight
—
No evidence of family members lobbying, contracts tied to her office, or a notable staff-to-lobbyist pipeline was found in available public records. No data; not penalized.
Skips the job to fundraise
10% weight
4
Strong attendance: missed ~310 of 16,017 roll-call votes (1.9%) over 2001-2026, better than the ~2.1% chamber median. No evidence of paid speeches or fundraising-driven absenteeism. Minimal concern.

Sources behind this score: 4 reference database · 2 official record · 3 news reporting. Score = weighted average of the components that have data; the 2 without sourced evidence are excluded, never counted against the member. Methodology →

Embed this score on your site

Updates automatically when the score changes.

Right of reply

Is something here wrong or missing context? Members and their staff can send a correction or a statement. Statements are published on this page in full, and corrections go in the public log. Email corrections@greederboard.com.