Yvette D. Clarke
Rep. Yvette D. Clarke (D-NY9), in office since 2007, presents a largely clean financial-accountability record. Public trackers show no individual-stock STOCK Act trading; her disclosed assets have historically been mutual funds, removing the most common self-dealing vector. The most notable historical issue was a 2013 trip to Azerbaijan that became the subject of a 2015 Office of Congressional Ethics referral after undisclosed funders (later tied to Azerbaijan's state oil company SOCAR) emerged; the House Ethics Committee reviewed and absolved the traveling members of wrongdoing. As a senior member of the Energy and Commerce Committee she draws telecom/tech-sector contributions, a routine correlation (not proof) of influence; no recent FEC personal-use enforcement, family-lobbying, or net-worth-spike findings surfaced. Her lifetime missed-vote rate (3.7%) is modestly above the chamber median but not indicative of fundraising-driven absenteeism.
Public record
- In Congress since
- 2007
- Committees
- Energy and Commerce
- Missed votes, 119th Congress
- 2.4% (16 of 674; median member 1.9%)
- Campaign money, 2025–26 cycle
- $1.0M raised · 57% from PACs & committees · $31K cash on hand FEC ↗
The stock-trading ban
H.R. 7008 bans new stock purchases by members, spouses and dependents; it doesn't force sales of existing holdings. The Senate vote was on the version paired with the SAVE Act, which is why no Democrat voted yes. Full breakdown →
Disclosed stock trades
No periodic transaction reports on file since 2024. That's the norm: most members don't trade individual stocks, or hold them in blind trusts and diversified funds.
Amounts are the ranges members must report, not exact values. The STOCK Act requires a report within 45 days of a trade; "late" counts days past that deadline, measured to the filing date.
How the score breaks down
Sources behind this score: 1 data aggregator · 6 reference database · 1 news reporting · 2 official record. Score = weighted average of the components that have data; the 2 without sourced evidence are excluded, never counted against the member. Methodology →
Right of reply
Is something here wrong or missing context? Members and their staff can send a correction or a statement. Statements are published on this page in full, and corrections go in the public log. Email corrections@greederboard.com.