Greederboard
Official portrait of Margaret Wood Hassan

Margaret Wood Hassan

D Democrat · Senator, New Hampshire
6
Low self-dealing
4/6 components have data
#189 of 193 scored

Senator Maggie Hassan (D-NH) presents a generally clean public accountability record. Her disclosed portfolio (estimated $2.3M-$7.2M net worth, ~$3.9M trackable) consists of mutual funds, ETFs (TIP, VUG), annuities, and bank deposits rather than individual stocks, with much of the wealth attributable to her husband and predating her Senate tenure; no individual-stock STOCK Act trading or reporting violations were found. She maintains an excellent voting attendance record (33 of 3,787 votes missed, 0.9%, better than the Senate median). No reported instances of campaign/leadership-PAC personal-use abuse, family lobbying tied to her office, or staff-to-lobbyist scandals surfaced in available public records. Industry donor concentrations (women's issues, health/medical, lawyers) are typical for her profile and reflect correlation rather than proof of any improper influence.

Public record

In Congress since
2017
Committees
Joint Economic Committee (Ranking Member)
Finance
Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
Veterans' Affairs
Missed votes, 119th Congress
1.5% (14 of 915; median member 1.9%)
Campaign money, 2025–26 cycle
$2.5M raised · 22% from PACs & committees · $1.7M cash on hand FEC ↗

The stock-trading ban

Senate cloture on H.R. 7008, Sep 30, 2026
No
Cosponsored a ban bill
None

H.R. 7008 bans new stock purchases by members, spouses and dependents; it doesn't force sales of existing holdings. The Senate vote was on the version paired with the SAVE Act, which is why no Democrat voted yes. Full breakdown →

Disclosed stock trades

No periodic transaction reports on file since 2024. That's the norm: most members don't trade individual stocks, or hold them in blind trusts and diversified funds.

Amounts are the ranges members must report, not exact values. The STOCK Act requires a report within 45 days of a trade; "late" counts days past that deadline, measured to the filing date.

How the score breaks down

Stock self-trading
25% weight
0
No individual-stock trading found. Disclosed holdings are ETFs/mutual funds (iShares TIP, Vanguard VUG), TIAA annuities, and bank deposits — not single-company equities — so STOCK Act self-dealing concerns do not apply. No reported reporting violations.
Net-worth enrichment in office
15% weight
5
Net worth estimated $2.3M-$7.2M (Quiver ~$6.0M, Dec 2025). Much derives from her husband Thomas's career/business and pre-office assets, and growth tracks broad-market index funds. No evidence of enrichment beyond salary plus market returns over her tenure.
Money → action alignmentcorrelation, not proof of any quid-pro-quo
20% weight
15
Correlation, not proof. Top donor industries include women's-issues/abortion-rights groups, lawyers/law firms, health professionals, and medical devices — sectors overlapping her Finance and HELP committee jurisdiction. Typical for her profile; no specific quid-pro-quo vote alignment documented.
Campaign-fund personal useno data
15% weight
—
No reported instances of campaign or leadership-PAC funds used for personal benefit. Her committees (Maggie for NH, Maggie Hassan Victory Fund) appear in routine FEC filings; no personal-use findings located.
Revolving door & familyno data
15% weight
—
No public records found of family members lobbying tied to her office or a notable staff-to-lobbyist pipeline. Husband Thomas Hassan's career is in education administration (Phillips Exeter, School Year Abroad), unrelated to federal lobbying.
Skips the job to fundraise
10% weight
3
Strong attendance: missed 33 of 3,787 roll-call votes (0.9%) from 2017 to June 2026, better than the Senate median of 2.8%. Routine fundraising via joint committees; no evidence fundraising or paid speeches displaced legislative duties.

Sources behind this score: 4 data aggregator · 3 reference database · 2 official record. Score = weighted average of the components that have data; the 2 without sourced evidence are excluded, never counted against the member. Methodology →

Embed this score on your site

Updates automatically when the score changes.

Right of reply

Is something here wrong or missing context? Members and their staff can send a correction or a statement. Statements are published on this page in full, and corrections go in the public log. Email corrections@greederboard.com.