Christopher Murphy
Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) presents as a comparatively clean record on self-dealing metrics. He does not trade individual stocks, removing the highest-risk category entirely, and his estimated net worth is modest-to-negative (anchored by two mortgages), showing no enrichment beyond salary. His strongest signal is fundraising-related: Securities & Investment was the top industry to his 2024 joint Victory Fund and Soros Fund Management his top donor, but this is correlation only, weakened by the fact that he sits on Appropriations, HELP, and Foreign Relations rather than committees with securities jurisdiction. He maintains a strong voting-attendance record (1.2% missed, better than median), and no credible reporting was found alleging personal use of campaign funds or family/revolving-door lobbying tied to his office. Several categories returned insufficient data and were scored zero per the no-penalty-for-absence rule.
Public record
- In Congress since
- 2007
- Committees
- Appropriations
Foreign Relations
Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions - Missed votes, 119th Congress
- 2.7% (25 of 915; median member 1.9%)
- Campaign money, 2025–26 cycle
- $13M raised · 0% from PACs & committees · $11M cash on hand FEC ↗
The stock-trading ban
H.R. 7008 bans new stock purchases by members, spouses and dependents; it doesn't force sales of existing holdings. The Senate vote was on the version paired with the SAVE Act, which is why no Democrat voted yes. Full breakdown →
Disclosed stock trades
No periodic transaction reports on file since 2024. That's the norm: most members don't trade individual stocks, or hold them in blind trusts and diversified funds.
Amounts are the ranges members must report, not exact values. The STOCK Act requires a report within 45 days of a trade; "late" counts days past that deadline, measured to the filing date.
How the score breaks down
Sources behind this score: 4 data aggregator · 3 reference database · 2 official record. Score = weighted average of the components that have data; the 2 without sourced evidence are excluded, never counted against the member. Methodology →
Right of reply
Is something here wrong or missing context? Members and their staff can send a correction or a statement. Statements are published on this page in full, and corrections go in the public log. Email corrections@greederboard.com.