Greederboard
Official portrait of John Barrasso

John Barrasso

R Republican · Senator, Wyoming
25
Moderate self-dealing
2/6 components have data
#72 of 193 scored

Barrasso's disclosed portfolio is dominated by broad index and mutual funds (Vanguard total-market/bond/Wellington) with limited individual-stock exposure, and trackers show little active trading. As a longtime fossil-fuel advocate now serving as Majority Whip and a senior Energy/Environment figure, his voting record aligns with the oil-and-gas industry that is among his top donors — a correlation OpenSecrets documents, not proof of quid pro quo. No public reporting surfaced on campaign-fund personal use or revolving-door enrichment. His main accountability flag is donor/policy alignment in energy.

Public record

In Congress since
2007
Committees
Energy and Natural Resources
Finance
Foreign Relations
Missed votes, 119th Congress
0.4% (4 of 915; median member 1.9%)
Campaign money, 2025–26 cycle
$1.6M raised · 24% from PACs & committees · $8.4M cash on hand FEC ↗

The stock-trading ban

Senate cloture on H.R. 7008, Sep 30, 2026
Yes
Cosponsored a ban bill
None

H.R. 7008 bans new stock purchases by members, spouses and dependents; it doesn't force sales of existing holdings. The Senate vote was on the version paired with the SAVE Act, which is why no Democrat voted yes. Full breakdown →

Disclosed stock trades

No periodic transaction reports on file since 2024. That's the norm: most members don't trade individual stocks, or hold them in blind trusts and diversified funds.

Amounts are the ranges members must report, not exact values. The STOCK Act requires a report within 45 days of a trade; "late" counts days past that deadline, measured to the filing date.

How the score breaks down

Stock self-trading
25% weight
5
Holdings are overwhelmingly broad index/mutual funds (Vanguard VTSAX, VWENX, VBTLX) with limited single-name exposure (e.g., Berkshire BRK-B). Little tracked active trading; low overlap of individual-stock trading with committee sectors.
Net-worth enrichment in officeno data
15% weight
—
Estimated ~$10.3M net worth (2025), but no reliable longitudinal data found isolating in-office growth beyond salary/market returns. Pre-office wealth (physician) not scored. Absence not penalized.
Money → action alignmentcorrelation, not proof of any quid-pro-quo
20% weight
50
Correlation, not proof. Oil & gas is among his top donor industries (OpenSecrets reports $585K+ over 2012-2017), and his record consistently favors fossil fuels and opposes climate regulation while holding senior energy/environment roles. No quid pro quo asserted.
Campaign-fund personal useno data
15% weight
—
No public reporting found alleging personal use of campaign/leadership-PAC funds. Absence not penalized.
Revolving door & familyno data
15% weight
—
No specific public reporting found tying family lobbying/contracts or a notable staff-to-lobbyist pipeline to his office. Absence not penalized.
Skips the job to fundraiseno data
10% weight
—
No public data found on elevated missed votes paired with heavy paid speeches/fundraising. Absence not penalized.

Sources behind this score: 2 data aggregator · 2 news reporting · 1 reference database. Score = weighted average of the components that have data; the 4 without sourced evidence are excluded, never counted against the member. Methodology →

Embed this score on your site

Updates automatically when the score changes.

Right of reply

Is something here wrong or missing context? Members and their staff can send a correction or a statement. Statements are published on this page in full, and corrections go in the public log. Email corrections@greederboard.com.