Eric Schmitt
Senator Eric Schmitt (R-MO), in office since 2023, presents a comparatively clean self-dealing profile across the public record. His disclosed financial holdings are broad-market index funds and ETFs (e.g., SPDR S&P 500 SPY, Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) plus US Treasury notes, with no evidence of individual single-stock trading under the STOCK Act; aggregators list essentially no periodic transaction reports. His estimated net worth is modest (~$1.0M, ranked roughly 291st in Congress), and his roll-call attendance is strong (about 2.6% missed votes, near the Senate median). As with all members, industry-donor concentration and aligned committee votes exist (correlation, not proof of corruption), but no documented campaign-fund personal use, family-lobbying contracts, or quid-pro-quo were found in available public records.
Public record
- In Congress since
- 2023
- Committees
- Joint Economic Committee (Vice Chairman)
Armed Services
Commerce, Science, and Transportation
Judiciary - Missed votes, 119th Congress
- 1.2% (11 of 915; median member 1.9%)
- Campaign money, 2025–26 cycle
- $3.3M raised · 8% from PACs & committees · $1.6M cash on hand FEC ↗
The stock-trading ban
H.R. 7008 bans new stock purchases by members, spouses and dependents; it doesn't force sales of existing holdings. The Senate vote was on the version paired with the SAVE Act, which is why no Democrat voted yes. Full breakdown →
Disclosed stock trades
No periodic transaction reports on file since 2024. That's the norm: most members don't trade individual stocks, or hold them in blind trusts and diversified funds.
Amounts are the ranges members must report, not exact values. The STOCK Act requires a report within 45 days of a trade; "late" counts days past that deadline, measured to the filing date.
How the score breaks down
Sources behind this score: 4 data aggregator · 3 official record · 3 reference database. Score = weighted average of the components that have data; the 2 without sourced evidence are excluded, never counted against the member. Methodology →
Right of reply
Is something here wrong or missing context? Members and their staff can send a correction or a statement. Statements are published on this page in full, and corrections go in the public log. Email corrections@greederboard.com.