Tammy Duckworth
Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) presents a relatively clean financial-accountability profile. STOCK Act filings show a modest set of individual-stock sales (NextEra, Ingersoll Rand/ITW, Verizon, Caterpillar, Mondelez) between roughly 2017 and 2023, but her holdings are dominated by diversified mutual funds, ETFs, USAA accounts, and a 529 plan rather than concentrated single-stock positions; she is also a public co-sponsor of the ETHICS Act and Ban Congressional Stock Trading Act. Her estimated net worth (~$1.3M, among the lower half of the Senate) shows no evidence of anomalous enrichment beyond salary and market growth. No FEC personal-use findings, no family lobbying ties (her husband is a career military/government IT official), and her 4.9% missed-vote rate is modestly above the Senate median but within normal ranges and not paired with documented self-dealing. Money-influence and industry-concentration data were not fully retrievable and are labeled correlation-only where partial.
Public record
- In Congress since
- 2013
- Committees
- Armed Services
Commerce, Science, and Transportation
Foreign Relations
Veterans' Affairs - Missed votes, 119th Congress
- 6.6% (60 of 915; median member 1.9%)
- Campaign money, 2025–26 cycle
- $5.1M raised · 3% from PACs & committees · $4.1M cash on hand FEC ↗
The stock-trading ban
H.R. 7008 bans new stock purchases by members, spouses and dependents; it doesn't force sales of existing holdings. The Senate vote was on the version paired with the SAVE Act, which is why no Democrat voted yes. Full breakdown →
Disclosed stock trades
No periodic transaction reports on file since 2024. That's the norm: most members don't trade individual stocks, or hold them in blind trusts and diversified funds.
Amounts are the ranges members must report, not exact values. The STOCK Act requires a report within 45 days of a trade; "late" counts days past that deadline, measured to the filing date.
How the score breaks down
Sources behind this score: 3 data aggregator · 2 official record · 3 reference database. Score = weighted average of the components that have data; the 2 without sourced evidence are excluded, never counted against the member. Methodology →
Right of reply
Is something here wrong or missing context? Members and their staff can send a correction or a statement. Statements are published on this page in full, and corrections go in the public log. Email corrections@greederboard.com.