Andy Kim
Senator Andy Kim (D-NJ), elected to the Senate in 2024 after three House terms, presents a largely clean public record on self-dealing metrics. His financial disclosures show only diversified index funds, ETFs, and target-date retirement funds rather than active individual-stock trading, and his estimated net worth (~$1.6M) is mid-pack for Congress. No ethics complaints, personal-use-of-funds allegations, or family lobbying ties surfaced in public records; his spouse is a tax attorney. His Senate voting attendance is among the strongest in the chamber (about 0.8% missed votes). The only modest signals are routine industry concentration in his donor base (securities/investment, lawyers) common to NJ Democrats, which is correlation, not proof of influence.
Public record
- In Congress since
- 2019
- Committees
- Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs
Commerce, Science, and Transportation
Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
Senate Special Committee on Aging - Missed votes, 119th Congress
- 1.0% (9 of 915; median member 1.9%)
- Campaign money, 2025–26 cycle
- $1.7M raised · 4% from PACs & committees · $1.2M cash on hand FEC ↗
The stock-trading ban
H.R. 7008 bans new stock purchases by members, spouses and dependents; it doesn't force sales of existing holdings. The Senate vote was on the version paired with the SAVE Act, which is why no Democrat voted yes. Full breakdown →
Disclosed stock trades
No periodic transaction reports on file since 2024. That's the norm: most members don't trade individual stocks, or hold them in blind trusts and diversified funds.
Amounts are the ranges members must report, not exact values. The STOCK Act requires a report within 45 days of a trade; "late" counts days past that deadline, measured to the filing date.
How the score breaks down
Sources behind this score: 4 data aggregator · 4 reference database · 1 official record. Score = weighted average of the components that have data; the 2 without sourced evidence are excluded, never counted against the member. Methodology →
Right of reply
Is something here wrong or missing context? Members and their staff can send a correction or a statement. Statements are published on this page in full, and corrections go in the public log. Email corrections@greederboard.com.