Jim Costa
Jim Costa is a long-serving Democratic U.S. Representative from California (in Congress since 2005, currently CA-21) and a senior member of the House Agriculture Committee. His wealth (estimated ~$4.4-4.9M) is concentrated in farmland and real estate (James M. Costa Farms, a rental home) rather than a stock portfolio; financial trackers show essentially no individual-stock trading activity, so STOCK Act self-dealing risk is minimal. His campaign donor base is heavily concentrated in agribusiness/crop-production interests that align with his committee role and longstanding pro-agriculture advocacy, which represents correlation rather than proof of quid pro quo. The most notable accountability data point is his missed-vote rate of about 5.4% (748 of 13,828 lifetime votes through May 2026), well above the ~2.1% median for sitting representatives; no documented ethics violations, campaign-fund personal-use findings, or family-lobbying ties were located.
Public record
- In Congress since
- 2005
- Committees
- Agriculture
Foreign Affairs - Missed votes, 119th Congress
- 3.9% (26 of 674; median member 1.9%)
- Campaign money, 2025–26 cycle
- $1.3M raised · 60% from PACs & committees · $939K cash on hand FEC ↗
The stock-trading ban
H.R. 7008 bans new stock purchases by members, spouses and dependents; it doesn't force sales of existing holdings. The Senate vote was on the version paired with the SAVE Act, which is why no Democrat voted yes. Full breakdown →
Disclosed stock trades
No periodic transaction reports on file since 2024. That's the norm: most members don't trade individual stocks, or hold them in blind trusts and diversified funds.
Amounts are the ranges members must report, not exact values. The STOCK Act requires a report within 45 days of a trade; "late" counts days past that deadline, measured to the filing date.
How the score breaks down
Sources behind this score: 2 data aggregator · 5 reference database · 2 official record. Score = weighted average of the components that have data; the 3 without sourced evidence are excluded, never counted against the member. Methodology →
Right of reply
Is something here wrong or missing context? Members and their staff can send a correction or a statement. Statements are published on this page in full, and corrections go in the public log. Email corrections@greederboard.com.