Greederboard
Official portrait of Lisa Murkowski

Lisa Murkowski

R Republican · Senator, Alaska
22
Low self-dealing
4/6 components have data
#94 of 193 scored

Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) holds a passive individual-stock position (Wells Fargo, up to $500K) plus index funds and a DC rental property, but trackers show no active individual-stock trading over recent years, limiting STOCK Act timing concerns. Her disclosed net worth (roughly $1.2M-$3.2M range) is modest for a long-tenured senator and shows no evidence of growth beyond salary and market returns. Her strongest accountability signal is correlation-based: the oil and gas industry has historically been among her top donors while she sits on the Energy and Natural Resources Committee and supports Alaska energy development, though this is alignment, not proof of quid pro quo. No FEC personal-use violations or family-lobbying ties surfaced in public records; her lifetime missed-vote rate (about 4.8%) is somewhat above the Senate median but not extreme.

Public record

In Congress since
2003
Committees
Indian Affairs (Chairman)
Appropriations
Energy and Natural Resources
Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Missed votes, 119th Congress
4.2% (38 of 915; median member 1.9%)
Campaign money, 2025–26 cycle
$1.3M raised · 26% from PACs & committees · $1.5M cash on hand FEC ↗

The stock-trading ban

Senate cloture on H.R. 7008, Sep 30, 2026
Yes
Cosponsored a ban bill
None

H.R. 7008 bans new stock purchases by members, spouses and dependents; it doesn't force sales of existing holdings. The Senate vote was on the version paired with the SAVE Act, which is why no Democrat voted yes. Full breakdown →

Disclosed stock trades

No periodic transaction reports on file since 2024. That's the norm: most members don't trade individual stocks, or hold them in blind trusts and diversified funds.

Amounts are the ranges members must report, not exact values. The STOCK Act requires a report within 45 days of a trade; "late" counts days past that deadline, measured to the filing date.

How the score breaks down

Stock self-trading
25% weight
12
Holds an individual-stock position in Wells Fargo (WFC, up to $500K) plus SPY and tax-exempt funds, but congressional-trade trackers report no active individual-stock transactions in recent years. Low self-dealing signal: a passive single-name holding with no documented trading timing or volume, though WFC is a regulated sector she could touch via banking-related votes.
Net-worth enrichment in office
15% weight
5
Disclosed net worth falls roughly in the $1.17M-$3.16M range (2023 filing), modest for a senator serving since 2002. No public evidence of growth outpacing salary plus normal market/real-estate appreciation; primary assets are a DC rental apartment and a single equity position.
Money → action alignmentcorrelation, not proof of any quid-pro-quo
20% weight
45
CORRELATION, NOT PROOF. Oil and gas has long ranked among Murkowski's top industry donors (e.g., ~$611K over six years cited in 2015), while she serves on / has chaired the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee and consistently backs Alaska oil, gas, and ANWR development. Donor-vote alignment is real but reflects Alaska's resource economy and is not evidence of a quid pro quo.
Campaign-fund personal useno data
15% weight
—
No FEC enforcement actions or credible reports of campaign or leadership-PAC funds used for personal benefit surfaced in public records. Heavy out-of-state fundraising was noted by a 2025 opinion piece but concerns donor sourcing, not personal use.
Revolving door & familyno data
15% weight
—
No documented evidence of family members lobbying tied to her office or contracts, nor a notable staff-to-lobbyist pipeline, surfaced in public records. (Her father Frank Murkowski appointed her to the seat in 2002, but that predates and is separate from lobbying-for-profit concerns.)
Skips the job to fundraise
10% weight
25
Lifetime missed-vote rate of about 4.8% (389 of 8,105 roll calls, 2003-2026) is above the ~2.8% median of currently serving senators. Combined with strong out-of-state fundraising (~$6.8M raised in off-cycle 2025), there is modestly elevated job-vs-fundraising signal, though no evidence votes were missed specifically for fundraising or paid speeches.

Sources behind this score: 2 data aggregator · 5 reference database · 1 official record · 1 news reporting. Score = weighted average of the components that have data; the 2 without sourced evidence are excluded, never counted against the member. Methodology →

Embed this score on your site

Updates automatically when the score changes.

Right of reply

Is something here wrong or missing context? Members and their staff can send a correction or a statement. Statements are published on this page in full, and corrections go in the public log. Email corrections@greederboard.com.