Mazie K. Hirono
Senator Mazie Hirono (D-HI) presents a largely clean accountability profile. She holds no tracked individual-stock positions and has had no recorded congressional stock trades in recent years; her portfolio is held in mutual funds, retirement plans, and bank deposits, and she co-sponsors legislation (ETHICS Act) to ban member stock trading. Her estimated net worth (roughly $3.4M-$11.8M range, ~$7.4M midpoint in 2025) places her around the middle of the Senate; substantial portions appear tied to mutual-fund market gains rather than anomalous enrichment, and pre-office wealth is excluded. Standard industry donations (lawyers/law firms, labor, finance) correlate with her committee work but no specific quid pro quo is documented; her vote-attendance is excellent (~0.9% missed lifetime), and no campaign-fund personal-use or family-lobbying findings surfaced in public records.
Public record
- In Congress since
- 2007
- Committees
- Armed Services
Energy and Natural Resources
Small Business and Entrepreneurship
Judiciary
Veterans' Affairs - Missed votes, 119th Congress
- 0.4% (4 of 915; median member 1.9%)
- Campaign money, 2025–26 cycle
- $563K raised · 7% from PACs & committees · $1.4M cash on hand FEC ↗
The stock-trading ban
H.R. 7008 bans new stock purchases by members, spouses and dependents; it doesn't force sales of existing holdings. The Senate vote was on the version paired with the SAVE Act, which is why no Democrat voted yes. Full breakdown →
Disclosed stock trades
No periodic transaction reports on file since 2024. That's the norm: most members don't trade individual stocks, or hold them in blind trusts and diversified funds.
Amounts are the ranges members must report, not exact values. The STOCK Act requires a report within 45 days of a trade; "late" counts days past that deadline, measured to the filing date.
How the score breaks down
Sources behind this score: 2 data aggregator · 3 official record · 4 reference database. Score = weighted average of the components that have data; the 2 without sourced evidence are excluded, never counted against the member. Methodology →
Right of reply
Is something here wrong or missing context? Members and their staff can send a correction or a statement. Statements are published on this page in full, and corrections go in the public log. Email corrections@greederboard.com.