Senator Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) presents a mixed accountability profile dominated by campaign-finance optics rather than personal-stock enrichment. He is one of the least wealthy senators, with low-to-negative net worth and no active public-equity trading, though he did file STOCK Act disclosures for a few private holdings years late and called them inadvertent errors. The strongest concerns are his leadership PAC (JUNTOS) funding luxury family travel and the conflict posed by his lobbyist wife, whose National Association of Realtors clients overlap with bills he has supported, alongside Wall Street/crypto fundraising while he sits on the Banking digital-assets subcommittee. These items are largely permissible under current FEC and ethics rules and represent correlation rather than proven self-dealing; his above-median missed-vote rate is substantially explained by his Senate campaign and parental leave.
Public record
In Congress since
2015
Committees
Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Energy and Natural Resources Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Veterans' Affairs Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe
Missed votes, 119th Congress
12.7% (116 of 915; median member 1.9%)
Campaign money, 2025–26 cycle
$4.3M raised · 10% from PACs & committees · $2.1M cash on hand FEC ↗
H.R. 7008 bans new stock purchases by members, spouses and dependents; it doesn't force sales of existing holdings. The Senate vote was on the version paired with the SAVE Act, which is why no Democrat voted yes. Full breakdown →
Amounts are the ranges members must report, not exact values. The STOCK Act requires a report within 45 days of a trade; "late" counts days past that deadline, measured to the filing date.
How the score breaks down
Stock self-trading
25% weight
22
No evidence of active public-equity trading. Disclosed holdings are a few private/early-stage stakes (Aspiration Fund Adviser, NameCoach), not a churning brokerage portfolio. The notable issue is STOCK Act compliance: he reported purchases (NameCoach 2022, Aspiration 2019) years late in an Aug 2024 corrected filing, ~791 days past one deadline. His office called them inadvertent errors. No committee-sector timing or market-beating-return pattern documented. Score reflects late-disclosure/transparency lapse rather than volume or suspicious-timing trading.
Gallego is among the least wealthy members of Congress; estimates place net worth from near $0 to negative (roughly -$2.0M to -$0.9M) due to liabilities. No evidence of net-worth growth beyond salary/market during tenure; if anything disclosures show low or negative net worth. No abnormal enrichment to score.
Money → action alignmentcorrelation, not proof of any quid-pro-quo
20% weight
45
Correlation, not proof. As top Democrat on the Banking subcommittee on digital assets, Gallego oversees the crypto/financial industry that funds him; he held a 2025 Nantucket fundraiser hosted by Wall Street and crypto lobbyists (clients including JPMorgan, Apollo, Citigroup). Separately, his wife is a National Association of Realtors lobbyist; NAR gave ~$34K since 2014 and he voted for 38 NAR-lobbied bills. Concentration plus aligned votes is suggestive but not proof of quid pro quo.
June 2026 reporting (Daily Beast, Phoenix New Times) found Gallego's JUNTOS leadership PAC (~$1.5M raised) funded luxury family travel logged as fundraising-related: Disney World/Disneyland, a >$9,000 Loews Miami Beach stay tied to his wife's birthday, St. Barts, and a 2023 Super Bowl outing via the joint 'Swallego Victory Fund.' The PAC also paid >$18K in child-care reimbursements, including $400 to his mother-in-law. Leadership PACs are exempt from the personal-use ban, so this is legally permissible; Gallego denies any FEC violation. Pattern of personal-benefit spending is documented but within current rules.
Direct family-lobbying nexus: spouse Sydney Barron is a registered lobbyist (National Association of Realtors government-advocacy director) while Gallego sits in a position to act on her clients' legislation; he has voted for/sponsored numerous NAR-lobbied bills. No documented federal contracts to family or notable staff-to-lobbyist pipeline found. Score driven by spousal-lobbying conflict tied to his office.
GovTrack: Jan 2015-June 2026 Gallego missed 107 of 840 roll-call votes (12.7%), well above the ~2.8% senator median, though much of the elevated rate ties to his 2023-24 Senate campaign and documented parental leave rather than to paid speeches. Heavy fundraising activity (e.g., $815K disclosed, Nantucket donor events) coincides with the campaign period. No evidence of paid private speeches. Score reflects above-median missed votes partly explained by campaigning/leave.
Sources behind this score: 6 news reporting · 2 data aggregator · 1 reference database. Score = weighted average of the components that have data; the 0 without sourced evidence are excluded, never counted against the member. Methodology →
Embed this score on your site
Updates automatically when the score changes.
Right of reply
Is something here wrong or missing context? Members and their staff can send a correction or a statement. Statements are published on this page in full, and corrections go in the public log. Email corrections@greederboard.com.
