Steve Daines
Steve Daines is a wealthy senator (estimated $21M+, with disclosures ranging up to ~$28M) whose fortune is overwhelmingly pre-office, derived from the 2012 Oracle acquisition of RightNow Technologies where he was an executive; pre-office wealth is not scored and there is no evidence of abnormal in-office enrichment. On the trading dimension he scores very low: trackers (Quiver, MarketBeat) show essentially no individual-stock trading—his holdings are real estate, money-market funds, and private investments—and he co-sponsored bipartisan legislation to ban congressional stock trading. The most notable accountability item is an FEC audit finding that his 2020 re-election campaign failed to properly disclose more than $1 million, but those were reporting/disclosure errors, not personal use or self-enrichment. His donor profile shows energy/oil-and-gas money aligning with his Energy & Natural Resources Committee seat and pro-energy legislation (correlation, not proof), and his 3.0% missed-vote rate is on par with the Senate median.
Public record
- In Congress since
- 2013
- Committees
- Energy and Natural Resources
Finance
Foreign Relations
Indian Affairs - Missed votes, 119th Congress
- 2.8% (26 of 915; median member 1.9%)
- Campaign money, 2025–26 cycle
- $4.7M raised · 29% from PACs & committees · $2.6M cash on hand FEC ↗
The stock-trading ban
H.R. 7008 bans new stock purchases by members, spouses and dependents; it doesn't force sales of existing holdings. The Senate vote was on the version paired with the SAVE Act, which is why no Democrat voted yes. Full breakdown →
Disclosed stock trades
No periodic transaction reports on file since 2024. That's the norm: most members don't trade individual stocks, or hold them in blind trusts and diversified funds.
Amounts are the ranges members must report, not exact values. The STOCK Act requires a report within 45 days of a trade; "late" counts days past that deadline, measured to the filing date.
How the score breaks down
Sources behind this score: 2 data aggregator · 2 official record · 3 news reporting · 1 reference database. Score = weighted average of the components that have data; the 1 without sourced evidence are excluded, never counted against the member. Methodology →
Right of reply
Is something here wrong or missing context? Members and their staff can send a correction or a statement. Statements are published on this page in full, and corrections go in the public log. Email corrections@greederboard.com.