Senator Deb Fischer (R-NE) presents a largely clean self-dealing profile. Her individual-stock activity is minimal and consists of a single June 23, 2022 full liquidation of four blue-chip positions (Caterpillar, Coca-Cola, Cisco, Lockheed Martin) totaling roughly $166K; the Lockheed sale overlaps her Armed Services Committee seat, but a one-time divestment with no subsequent trading is weak evidence of self-dealing. Her reported wealth is dominated by pre-office ranch assets (Sunny Slope Ranch), and there is no public evidence of net-worth growth beyond salary/market or of campaign-fund personal use, family lobbying, or a documented staff-to-lobbyist pipeline; she also has a strong voting-attendance record (1.5% missed). The most substantive concern is correlation-only: heavy contributions from pharma, agriculture, defense, and transportation industries that overlap her committees and votes, which is common for incumbents and is not proof of a quid pro quo.
Public record
In Congress since
2013
Committees
Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Appropriations Armed Services Commerce, Science, and Transportation Rules and Administration Joint Committee on Printing
Missed votes, 119th Congress
1.0% (9 of 915; median member 1.9%)
Campaign money, 2025–26 cycle
$832K raised · 41% from PACs & committees · $408K cash on hand FEC ↗
H.R. 7008 bans new stock purchases by members, spouses and dependents; it doesn't force sales of existing holdings. The Senate vote was on the version paired with the SAVE Act, which is why no Democrat voted yes. Full breakdown →
Disclosed stock trades
No periodic transaction reports on file since 2024. That's the norm: most members don't trade individual stocks, or hold them in blind trusts and diversified funds.
Amounts are the ranges members must report, not exact values. The STOCK Act requires a report within 45 days of a trade; "late" counts days past that deadline, measured to the filing date.
How the score breaks down
Stock self-trading
25% weight
18
Only individual-stock activity on record is a single June 23, 2022 full liquidation of four blue-chip stocks (CAT, KO, CSCO, LMT), ~$166K total. The Lockheed Martin (defense) sale overlaps her Senate Armed Services Committee seat, a sector-overlap flag, but it was a one-time divestment (selling, not accumulating) with no subsequent trading and no documented suspicious timing or market-beating pattern. Low volume, no recurring activity.
Reported net worth (OpenSecrets ~$2.8M in 2018; recent disclosure range ~$959K-$6.96M) is dominated by the pre-office Sunny Slope Ranch non-public stock ($1M-$5M), which is pre-office wealth and not scored. No public analysis demonstrates net-worth growth beyond salary plus market returns over her tenure. Range-based disclosures make precise tracking impossible.
Money → action alignmentcorrelation, not proof of any quid-pro-quo
20% weight
40
CORRELATION, NOT PROOF. Fischer is a top recipient from industries that overlap her committee seats: sugar/agriculture and meat processing (Agriculture Committee), railroads/trucking (Commerce Committee), and defense electronics (Armed Services). She also took $205K+ from pharma since 2012 plus $26K in leadership-PAC pharma money while opposing drug-price reductions. This donor-committee-vote alignment is typical of senior incumbents and is not evidence of a quid pro quo.
No public FEC complaint or reporting alleges personal use of campaign or leadership-PAC funds by Fischer. (A 2024 personal-use/family-payment complaint targeted her opponent Dan Osborn, not Fischer.) No evidence of self-dealing found.
No public evidence of family lobbying tied to her office; husband Bruce Fischer is a cattle rancher with no documented lobbying. No reporting surfaced documenting a notable staff-to-lobbyist pipeline. LegiStorm/OpenSecrets revolving-door profiles exist but no specific self-dealing activity was found in available sources.
Strong attendance: missed only 72 of 4,934 roll-call votes (1.5%) from 2013 to June 2026, better than the Senate median (2.8%), with a perfect record by the 114th Congress. No evidence of vote-skipping for fundraising or paid speeches.
Sources behind this score: 2 data aggregator · 4 reference database · 2 news reporting. Score = weighted average of the components that have data; the 3 without sourced evidence are excluded, never counted against the member. Methodology →
Embed this score on your site
Updates automatically when the score changes.
Right of reply
Is something here wrong or missing context? Members and their staff can send a correction or a statement. Statements are published on this page in full, and corrections go in the public log. Email corrections@greederboard.com.