Raphael G. Warnock
Senator Raphael Warnock (D-GA), in office since January 2021, shows a relatively clean self-dealing profile. He reports no individual-stock trading and has co-sponsored/championed legislation banning congressional stock trading. His net worth has roughly doubled since taking office, but the growth is largely attributable to documented book royalties (a memoir and children's book earning well over $1 million) plus mortgage/asset value shifts rather than market trading or unexplained windfalls. The clearest accountability notes are modest: a slightly above-median missed-vote rate (about 4% vs. a 2.8% Senate median) coinciding with record-setting fundraising, and criticism that his pledge to refuse corporate PAC money is undercut by accepting funds from leadership PACs and lobbyists that are themselves corporate-financed (correlation, not proof). No FEC personal-use findings or family-lobbying/revolving-door scandals were identified in public records.
Public record
- In Congress since
- 2021
- Committees
- Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry
Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs
Finance
Senate Special Committee on Aging - Missed votes, 119th Congress
- 2.8% (26 of 915; median member 1.9%)
- Campaign money, 2025–26 cycle
- $2.6M raised · 3% from PACs & committees · $4.1M cash on hand FEC ↗
The stock-trading ban
H.R. 7008 bans new stock purchases by members, spouses and dependents; it doesn't force sales of existing holdings. The Senate vote was on the version paired with the SAVE Act, which is why no Democrat voted yes. Full breakdown →
Disclosed stock trades
No periodic transaction reports on file since 2024. That's the norm: most members don't trade individual stocks, or hold them in blind trusts and diversified funds.
Amounts are the ranges members must report, not exact values. The STOCK Act requires a report within 45 days of a trade; "late" counts days past that deadline, measured to the filing date.
How the score breaks down
Sources behind this score: 1 data aggregator · 2 official record · 4 news reporting · 3 reference database. Score = weighted average of the components that have data; the 2 without sourced evidence are excluded, never counted against the member. Methodology →
Right of reply
Is something here wrong or missing context? Members and their staff can send a correction or a statement. Statements are published on this page in full, and corrections go in the public log. Email corrections@greederboard.com.