Rep. Gwen Moore (D-WI-4), in office since 2005 and a member of the powerful Ways and Means Committee, is among the least wealthy members of Congress, with disclosures showing negative-to-near-zero net worth and no individual-stock trading, so the self-dealing concerns most common to wealthy members (stock trades, net-worth enrichment) do not apply to her. Her most documented accountability issue is her leadership PAC, GWEN PAC, which drew formal ethics complaints from the Campaign Legal Center (2021) and the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust (2024) alleging it functioned as a "scam PAC," spending the large majority of funds on operating costs, food and travel (including payments to her sister) rather than on candidates; the FEC voted to dismiss the personal-use allegations and closed the matter in February 2025. She also has an elevated missed-vote rate (6.4% in 2023-24, highest in Wisconsin's delegation; 4.8% lifetime vs. a 2.1% median). Overall her record shows no evidence of trading-based or wealth-based self-dealing, with the leadership-PAC spending pattern the only notable—though officially unresolved/dismissed—concern.
Public record
In Congress since
2005
Committees
Joint Economic Committee Ways and Means
Missed votes, 119th Congress
3.1% (21 of 674; median member 1.9%)
Campaign money, 2025–26 cycle
$1.1M raised · 64% from PACs & committees · $29K cash on hand FEC ↗
The stock-trading ban
H.R. 7008 passage, Jul 22, 2026
No
Cosponsored a ban bill
None
H.R. 7008 bans new stock purchases by members, spouses and dependents; it doesn't force sales of existing holdings. The Senate vote was on the version paired with the SAVE Act, which is why no Democrat voted yes. Full breakdown →
Disclosed stock trades
No periodic transaction reports on file since 2024. That's the norm: most members don't trade individual stocks, or hold them in blind trusts and diversified funds.
Amounts are the ranges members must report, not exact values. The STOCK Act requires a report within 45 days of a trade; "late" counts days past that deadline, measured to the filing date.
How the score breaks down
Stock self-trading
25% weight
0
No periodic transaction reports filed; Moore is not an individual-stock trader. Reporting on Wisconsin's delegation confirms she has filed no STOCK Act trade reports, and her disclosures show essentially no securities holdings. Per rubric, 0 for no individual-stock trading.
Moore is consistently ranked among the least wealthy members of Congress, with reported net worth around negative/near-zero (e.g., -$75,001 estimate for 2017), a mortgage, and a small state pension. No evidence of net-worth growth beyond salary over her tenure.
Money → action alignmentcorrelation, not proof of any quid-pro-quo
20% weight
18
Correlation, not proof. Moore sits on the tax-writing Ways and Means Committee, which oversees banking, tax, trade and entitlements—sectors that fund many committee members. OpenSecrets tracks her contributors and industries, but detailed industry-concentration and aligned-vote linkage was not retrievable from public summaries during this review, so a specific quid-pro-quo pattern cannot be substantiated.
Two ethics watchdogs (Campaign Legal Center 2021; FACT 2024) filed formal complaints alleging her leadership PAC, GWEN PAC, functioned as a 'scam PAC,' spending only ~5% (2024 cycle) on candidates while the bulk went to operating costs, food, travel, alcohol, hotels and a wine-country resort, plus $53,150 in consulting including payments to her sister. The FEC voted in Jan. 2025 to dismiss the personal-use allegation and closed the matter; no violation was found, so the concern is documented but officially unresolved/dismissed.
The one documented office-to-family financial tie is GWEN PAC's consulting payments to Moore's sister, raised in the ethics complaints (FEC dismissed). No evidence found of family members lobbying her office or a notable staff-to-lobbyist pipeline tied to official acts; LegiStorm revolving-door data is paywalled and was not verifiable.
Moore has an elevated absence rate: 6.4% missed votes in 2023-24 (highest in Wisconsin's House delegation, top ~15% of the House) and 4.8% lifetime vs. a 2.1% median for sitting members, though her rate varies by Congress (1.5% in 2021-22). No evidence of paid speeches; the elevated absences alone moderately elevate this score.
Sources behind this score: 7 news reporting · 3 reference database · 1 official record. Score = weighted average of the components that have data; the 0 without sourced evidence are excluded, never counted against the member. Methodology →
Embed this score on your site
Updates automatically when the score changes.
Right of reply
Is something here wrong or missing context? Members and their staff can send a correction or a statement. Statements are published on this page in full, and corrections go in the public log. Email corrections@greederboard.com.