Greederboard
Official portrait of Martin Heinrich

Martin Heinrich

D Democrat · Senator, New Mexico
6
Low self-dealing
6/6 components have data
#188 of 193 scored

Senator Martin Heinrich (D-NM) presents a notably clean self-dealing profile. He is consistently ranked among the least wealthy U.S. senators, with reported net worth ranging from negative figures to the low hundreds of thousands, and his disclosed holdings are dominated by retirement plans, college-savings accounts, and diversified mutual funds rather than individual equities; he is also a cosponsor of legislation to ban congressional stock trading. His voting attendance is strong (about 2.5% missed votes lifetime, near the Senate median), and no credible reports indicate campaign-fund personal use or family lobbying/contracts tied to his office. The one notable item is a 2024 partisan/watchdog ethics complaint alleging he tied legislative solicitations to fundraising emails, which remains an unadjudicated allegation. Money-in-politics signals are routine industry/PAC contributions common to incumbents and are correlation, not proof of self-dealing.

Public record

In Congress since
2009
Committees
Energy and Natural Resources (Ranking Member)
Appropriations
Joint Economic Committee
Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
Missed votes, 119th Congress
3.7% (34 of 915; median member 1.9%)
Campaign money, 2025–26 cycle
$1.5M raised · 30% from PACs & committees · $548K cash on hand FEC ↗

The stock-trading ban

Senate cloture on H.R. 7008, Sep 30, 2026
No
Cosponsored a ban bill
None

H.R. 7008 bans new stock purchases by members, spouses and dependents; it doesn't force sales of existing holdings. The Senate vote was on the version paired with the SAVE Act, which is why no Democrat voted yes. Full breakdown →

Disclosed stock trades

No periodic transaction reports on file since 2024. That's the norm: most members don't trade individual stocks, or hold them in blind trusts and diversified funds.

Amounts are the ranges members must report, not exact values. The STOCK Act requires a report within 45 days of a trade; "late" counts days past that deadline, measured to the filing date.

How the score breaks down

Stock self-trading
25% weight
0
No evidence of individual-stock trading. Disclosures show diversified mutual funds, retirement (PERA NM, JPMCB SmartRetirement), and college-savings accounts; no individual-equity STOCK Act transactions surfaced. Heinrich cosponsors legislation to ban congressional stock trading. Scored 0 per rubric (no individual-stock trading).
Net-worth enrichment in office
15% weight
5
Heinrich is repeatedly ranked among the poorest senators: roughly -$43k to ~$53k net worth in 2013-2015 estimates, rising to ~$309k by 2018 and a 2023 range of about -$290k to +$564k. Growth is modest, consistent with salary/normal asset appreciation and not exceeding market+salary expectations; no enrichment signal. Low score reflects absence of outsized growth.
Money → action alignmentcorrelation, not proof of any quid-pro-quo
20% weight
20
CORRELATION, NOT PROOF. Heinrich receives routine industry and PAC contributions typical of an incumbent senator (tracked by OpenSecrets); contributions from lobbyists and sector PACs exist but no documented quid-pro-quo. Score reflects ordinary incumbent fundraising-vote alignment with no standout concentration evidence reviewed.
Campaign-fund personal use
15% weight
8
No evidence of campaign/leadership-PAC funds used for personal benefit. A 2024 watchdog (FACT, partisan-aligned) complaint alleged Heinrich improperly tied legislative solicitations to fundraising emails — an ethics-rules allegation, not personal-enrichment use of funds, and unadjudicated. Low score reflects an unresolved allegation, not proven misuse.
Revolving door & family
15% weight
0
No evidence of family lobbying or contracts tied to his office. Spouse Julie Heinrich serves as executive director of the Meow Wolf philanthropic foundation, an arts nonprofit role with no apparent lobbying or government-contract nexus. No staff-to-lobbyist pipeline evidence surfaced. Scored 0 per rubric (no data on self-dealing).
Skips the job to fundraise
10% weight
5
Strong attendance: missed 122 of 4,936 roll-call votes (2.5%) over his career, on par with the Senate median (~2.8%). No evidence of heavy paid speeches displacing official duties. Low score reflects good attendance with no fundraising-driven absenteeism.

Sources behind this score: 2 data aggregator · 1 official record · 3 news reporting · 3 reference database. Score = weighted average of the components that have data; the 0 without sourced evidence are excluded, never counted against the member. Methodology →

Embed this score on your site

Updates automatically when the score changes.

Right of reply

Is something here wrong or missing context? Members and their staff can send a correction or a statement. Statements are published on this page in full, and corrections go in the public log. Email corrections@greederboard.com.