Greederboard
Official portrait of Henry C. "Hank" Johnson, Jr.

Henry C. "Hank" Johnson, Jr.

D Democrat · Representative, Georgia 4th district
8
Low self-dealing
4/6 components have data
#177 of 193 scored

Rep. Hank Johnson (D-GA4), in office since 2007, has one of the lowest net worths in Congress (estimated at roughly $0 to slightly negative in recent years) and no tracked individual-stock trading activity, making stock-related self-dealing metrics inapplicable. His campaign is heavily PAC-funded (~80% of 2023-24 receipts), with transportation unions and Cox Enterprises among top donors, which correlates loosely with his Transportation and Judiciary committee work, but no documented quid-pro-quo exists. His only notable ethics matters are a 2021 protest-arrest fine (closed by the Ethics Committee) and a 2020 watchdog complaint alleging improper use of his official website to aid Jon Ossoff; neither resulted in major sanctions. Missed votes (3.7% lifetime) are modestly above the chamber median but not paired with heavy paid outside activity. Overall this is a comparatively low-risk profile.

Public record

In Congress since
2007
Committees
Transportation and Infrastructure
Judiciary
Missed votes, 119th Congress
1.5% (10 of 674; median member 1.9%)
Campaign money, 2025–26 cycle
$402K raised · 79% from PACs & committees · $118K cash on hand FEC ↗

The stock-trading ban

H.R. 7008 passage, Jul 22, 2026
No
Cosponsored a ban bill
None

H.R. 7008 bans new stock purchases by members, spouses and dependents; it doesn't force sales of existing holdings. The Senate vote was on the version paired with the SAVE Act, which is why no Democrat voted yes. Full breakdown →

Disclosed stock trades

No periodic transaction reports on file since 2024. That's the norm: most members don't trade individual stocks, or hold them in blind trusts and diversified funds.

Amounts are the ranges members must report, not exact values. The STOCK Act requires a report within 45 days of a trade; "late" counts days past that deadline, measured to the filing date.

How the score breaks down

Stock self-trading
25% weight
0
No individual-stock STOCK Act trades found. Quiver Quantitative tracks approximately $0 in publicly traded assets for Johnson, and OpenSecrets shows no equity holdings of note. Score 0 per rubric (no individual-stock trading).
Net-worth enrichment in office
15% weight
0
No enrichment beyond salary. Net worth has remained near zero or negative over tenure (OpenSecrets estimated -$110K for 2018; Quiver ~$32.5K in 2026). No evidence of growth beyond salary/market; rubric scores absence at 0.
Money → action alignmentcorrelation, not proof of any quid-pro-quo
20% weight
22
Correlation, not proof. Campaign is ~80% PAC-funded (2023-24). Top donors include Transportation Unions (~$60K) and Cox Enterprises (~$10K), broadly aligned with his Transportation & Infrastructure and Judiciary/antitrust roles. No documented quid-pro-quo; reflects routine industry concentration matching committee assignments.
Campaign-fund personal useno data
15% weight
—
No evidence of campaign or leadership-PAC funds used for personal benefit. A 2020 watchdog complaint alleged misuse of his official (taxpayer) House website to aid Jon Ossoff, but that concerns official resources, not campaign-funds personal use, and produced no sanction. No data on personal-use spending; scored 0 per no-penalize-absence rule.
Revolving door & familyno data
15% weight
—
No documented family lobbying, contracts tied to office, or staff-to-lobbyist pipeline found in available public records. Scored 0 per no-penalize-absence rule.
Skips the job to fundraise
10% weight
14
Lifetime missed-vote rate of 3.7% (472 of 12,653 votes, 2007-June 2026) is above the 2.1% median for currently serving representatives. No evidence of heavy paid speeches or outside income driving absences; modest score reflects the above-median attendance gap alone.

Sources behind this score: 2 data aggregator · 3 reference database · 1 official record · 1 news reporting. Score = weighted average of the components that have data; the 2 without sourced evidence are excluded, never counted against the member. Methodology →

Embed this score on your site

Updates automatically when the score changes.

Right of reply

Is something here wrong or missing context? Members and their staff can send a correction or a statement. Statements are published on this page in full, and corrections go in the public log. Email corrections@greederboard.com.