Chuck Grassley
Chuck Grassley (R-IA), in the Senate since 1981, presents a notably clean self-dealing profile. His disclosed assets are dominated by Iowa farmland (largely pre-office/inherited family farm) and diversified mutual funds, with no public record of individual-stock STOCK Act trading, which removes the most common conflict-of-interest vector. He holds the longest perfect-attendance voting streak in Senate history (no missed vote since 1993), undercutting any job-versus-fundraising concern. The main flaggable items are correlation-only: large career donations from pharmaceutical, insurance, and health-professional industries alongside his health/drug-pricing committee work (though his drug-pricing record is largely bipartisan and consumer-oriented), and isolated staff revolving-door instances common to long-tenured senators; none rise to documented self-enrichment.
Public record
- In Congress since
- 1975
- Committees
- Judiciary (Chairman)
Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry
Finance
Budget
Joint Committee on Taxation
United States Senate Caucus on International Narcotics Control - Missed votes, 119th Congress
- 2.6% (24 of 915; median member 1.9%)
- Campaign money, 2025–26 cycle
- $328K raised · 16% from PACs & committees · $360K cash on hand FEC ↗
The stock-trading ban
H.R. 7008 bans new stock purchases by members, spouses and dependents; it doesn't force sales of existing holdings. The Senate vote was on the version paired with the SAVE Act, which is why no Democrat voted yes. Full breakdown →
Disclosed stock trades
No periodic transaction reports on file since 2024. That's the norm: most members don't trade individual stocks, or hold them in blind trusts and diversified funds.
Amounts are the ranges members must report, not exact values. The STOCK Act requires a report within 45 days of a trade; "late" counts days past that deadline, measured to the filing date.
How the score breaks down
Sources behind this score: 1 data aggregator · 3 news reporting · 1 reference database · 2 official record. Score = weighted average of the components that have data; the 1 without sourced evidence are excluded, never counted against the member. Methodology →
Right of reply
Is something here wrong or missing context? Members and their staff can send a correction or a statement. Statements are published on this page in full, and corrections go in the public log. Email corrections@greederboard.com.