Ken Calvert
Ken Calvert (R-CA-41), a representative since 1993 and current chairman of the House Appropriations Defense Subcommittee, has a comparatively clean record on individual-stock trading; his wealth is concentrated in real estate rather than equities, so STOCK Act concerns are minimal. The most substantive accountability questions center on earmarks (Community Project Funding) he has directed to infrastructure projects located near rental and commercial properties he owns, which prompted a 2022 Office of Congressional Ethics complaint by End Citizens United and LA Times reporting noting properties he allegedly failed to disclose. As defense appropriations chair he is also a top recipient of defense-industry PAC money, a classic correlation (not proof) of money-influence overlap. His missed-vote rate is near the chamber median, and no campaign personal-use or family-lobbying findings surfaced in public records.
Public record
- In Congress since
- 1993
- Committees
- Appropriations
- Missed votes, 119th Congress
- 0.3% (2 of 674; median member 1.9%)
- Campaign money, 2025–26 cycle
- $6.1M raised · 22% from PACs & committees · $1.5M cash on hand FEC ↗
The stock-trading ban
H.R. 7008 bans new stock purchases by members, spouses and dependents; it doesn't force sales of existing holdings. The Senate vote was on the version paired with the SAVE Act, which is why no Democrat voted yes. Full breakdown →
Disclosed stock trades
No periodic transaction reports on file since 2024. That's the norm: most members don't trade individual stocks, or hold them in blind trusts and diversified funds.
Amounts are the ranges members must report, not exact values. The STOCK Act requires a report within 45 days of a trade; "late" counts days past that deadline, measured to the filing date.
How the score breaks down
Sources behind this score: 2 data aggregator · 3 reference database · 4 news reporting · 1 official record. Score = weighted average of the components that have data; the 1 without sourced evidence are excluded, never counted against the member. Methodology →
Right of reply
Is something here wrong or missing context? Members and their staff can send a correction or a statement. Statements are published on this page in full, and corrections go in the public log. Email corrections@greederboard.com.