Greederboard
Official portrait of Joni Ernst

Joni Ernst

R Republican · Senator, Iowa
10
Low self-dealing
5/6 components have data
#167 of 193 scored

Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA) shows no public record of personal or spousal individual-stock trading; congressional trade trackers (Quiver, MarketBeat) list no STOCK Act periodic transaction reports, the cleanest possible profile on that axis. Her estimated net worth (roughly $2-3M) is modest for the Senate and shows no documented anomalous growth beyond salary, book royalties, and a military pension. Her largest accountability flag is campaign-finance-related: the Campaign Legal Center and FEC general counsel found reason to believe her 2020 campaign illegally coordinated with the "dark money" group Iowa Values, though the FEC deadlocked and no personal-enrichment use of funds was established. Her voting attendance is strong (about 2.3% missed, below the Senate median), and standard committee-industry donor overlap (agriculture, defense) reflects correlation typical of her committee assignments rather than proven quid pro quo.

Public record

In Congress since
2015
Committees
Small Business and Entrepreneurship (Chairman)
Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry
Armed Services
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
Missed votes, 119th Congress
2.3% (21 of 915; median member 1.9%)
Campaign money, 2025–26 cycle
$2.0M raised · 32% from PACs & committees · $1.9M cash on hand FEC ↗

The stock-trading ban

Senate cloture on H.R. 7008, Sep 30, 2026
Yes
Cosponsored a ban bill
None

H.R. 7008 bans new stock purchases by members, spouses and dependents; it doesn't force sales of existing holdings. The Senate vote was on the version paired with the SAVE Act, which is why no Democrat voted yes. Full breakdown →

Disclosed stock trades

No periodic transaction reports on file since 2024. That's the norm: most members don't trade individual stocks, or hold them in blind trusts and diversified funds.

Amounts are the ranges members must report, not exact values. The STOCK Act requires a report within 45 days of a trade; "late" counts days past that deadline, measured to the filing date.

How the score breaks down

Stock self-tradinghousehold / spouse
25% weight
0
No individual-stock trading found. Congressional trade trackers list zero STOCK Act periodic transaction reports for Ernst or spouse; no committee-sector trading overlap to assess.
Net-worth enrichment in office
15% weight
5
Estimated net worth ~$2-3M; no documented growth beyond Senate salary, book royalties, and military pension. A widely-circulated $19M figure is unverified and not corroborated by filings.
Money → action alignmentcorrelation, not proof of any quid-pro-quo
20% weight
30
Correlation, not proof. Ernst sits on Agriculture and Armed Services committees; her career donor base concentrates in agribusiness and defense, the standard committee-industry overlap. NRA spent ~$3.1M supporting her 2014-2018. No specific quid pro quo documented.
Campaign-fund personal use
15% weight
10
No documented personal-use diversion of campaign or leadership-PAC funds. The Iowa Values 'dark money' matter is a coordination/soft-money allegation, not personal enrichment, and is scored primarily elsewhere; included here only as a campaign-finance integrity flag.
Revolving door & familyno data
15% weight
—
No public reporting found tying Ernst family members to lobbying or contracts linked to her office, nor a documented staff-to-lobbyist pipeline. Absence not penalized.
Skips the job to fundraise
10% weight
5
Strong attendance: missed ~100 of 4,289 roll-call votes (2.3%) from 2015 to mid-2026, below the Senate median of 2.8%. No evidence of heavy paid-speech activity displacing legislative duties.

Sources behind this score: 3 data aggregator · 4 reference database · 1 news reporting. Score = weighted average of the components that have data; the 1 without sourced evidence are excluded, never counted against the member. Methodology →

Embed this score on your site

Updates automatically when the score changes.

Right of reply

Is something here wrong or missing context? Members and their staff can send a correction or a statement. Statements are published on this page in full, and corrections go in the public log. Email corrections@greederboard.com.