Greederboard
Official portrait of Jeanne Shaheen

Jeanne Shaheen

D Democrat · Senator, New Hampshire
3
Low self-dealing
4/6 components have data
#192 of 193 scored

Senator Shaheen's wealth (estimated ~$7.8M) derives largely from her husband Bill Shaheen's private companies and commercial rental property rather than active individual-stock trading; MarketBeat shows no STOCK Act trade activity for her. She has co-sponsored the Ban Congressional Stock Trading Act and the ETHICS Act to tighten disclosure. Her missed-vote rate (2.6%) is on par with the Senate median, and no campaign-fund personal-use or revolving-door issues were found. Her record on the scored components is clean.

Public record

In Congress since
2009
Committees
Foreign Relations (Ranking Member)
Appropriations
Armed Services
Small Business and Entrepreneurship
Senate Select Committee on Ethics
Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe
Missed votes, 119th Congress
4.0% (37 of 915; median member 1.9%)
Campaign money, 2025–26 cycle
$173K raised · 32% from PACs & committees · $872K cash on hand FEC ↗

The stock-trading ban

Senate cloture on H.R. 7008, Sep 30, 2026
No
Cosponsored a ban bill
S. 1879

H.R. 7008 bans new stock purchases by members, spouses and dependents; it doesn't force sales of existing holdings. The Senate vote was on the version paired with the SAVE Act, which is why no Democrat voted yes. Full breakdown →

Disclosed stock trades

No periodic transaction reports on file since 2024. That's the norm: most members don't trade individual stocks, or hold them in blind trusts and diversified funds.

Amounts are the ranges members must report, not exact values. The STOCK Act requires a report within 45 days of a trade; "late" counts days past that deadline, measured to the filing date.

How the score breaks down

Stock self-trading
25% weight
0
MarketBeat shows no STOCK Act trade activity; while up to ~$315K of trades have been referenced by trackers, no active individual-stock trading pattern is documented; she advocates a trading ban.
Net-worth enrichment in office
15% weight
0
Net worth (~$7.8M) is mostly her husband's private companies and rental property; no evidence of growth beyond salary plus market during tenure.
Money → action alignmentcorrelation, not proof of any quid-pro-quo
20% weight
10
Correlation, not proof: receives standard industry and PAC contributions typical of a senior senator; no documented concentrated-donor-to-vote alignment beyond ordinary patterns.
Campaign-fund personal useno data
15% weight
—
No documented FEC findings or reporting of personal use of campaign or leadership-PAC funds.
Revolving door & familyno data
15% weight
—
No documented family lobbying tied to her office or notable staff-to-lobbyist pipeline found (husband runs private businesses, not registered lobbying tied to her committee work).
Skips the job to fundraise
10% weight
0
Missed 156 of 6,077 roll-call votes (2.6%) from 2009-2026, on par with the Senate median (~2.8%); no heavy paid-speech substitution documented.

Sources behind this score: 3 data aggregator · 2 official record · 2 reference database. Score = weighted average of the components that have data; the 2 without sourced evidence are excluded, never counted against the member. Methodology →

Embed this score on your site

Updates automatically when the score changes.

Right of reply

Is something here wrong or missing context? Members and their staff can send a correction or a statement. Statements are published on this page in full, and corrections go in the public log. Email corrections@greederboard.com.