Greederboard
Official portrait of Michael F. Bennet

Michael F. Bennet

D Democrat · Senator, Colorado
26
Moderate self-dealing
4/6 components have data
#63 of 193 scored

Bennet is among the wealthier senators (estimates ~$15M-$18M), much of it pre-office wealth from his finance/business career, and STOCK Act filings show meaningful individual-stock and fund activity (parsed trades up to ~$4.2M). He publicly supports the STOCK Act and has denied trading on legislation. In 2025-2026 he ran for Colorado governor, missing a large share of Senate votes (51 of 97 in one spring window) while raising ~$3.5M, much from venture-capital and private-equity donors. No documented campaign personal-use or revolving-door violations were found.

Public record

In Congress since
2009
Committees
Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry
Finance
Rules and Administration
Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
Missed votes, 119th Congress
9.0% (82 of 915; median member 1.9%)
Campaign money, 2025–26 cycle
$214K raised · 9% from PACs & committees · $202K cash on hand FEC ↗

The stock-trading ban

Senate cloture on H.R. 7008, Sep 30, 2026
No
Cosponsored a ban bill
S. 1879

H.R. 7008 bans new stock purchases by members, spouses and dependents; it doesn't force sales of existing holdings. The Senate vote was on the version paired with the SAVE Act, which is why no Democrat voted yes. Full breakdown →

Disclosed stock trades

No periodic transaction reports on file since 2024. That's the norm: most members don't trade individual stocks, or hold them in blind trusts and diversified funds.

Amounts are the ranges members must report, not exact values. The STOCK Act requires a report within 45 days of a trade; "late" counts days past that deadline, measured to the filing date.

How the score breaks down

Net-worth enrichment in office
15% weight
10
Net worth ~$15.7M (2018) to ~$17.9M (2025 est.); large but largely pre-office finance/business wealth, modest growth roughly tracking markets.
Money → action alignmentcorrelation, not proof of any quid-pro-quo
20% weight
25
Correlation, not proof: heavy finance/VC/PE donor concentration (top gubernatorial donors are VC/PE investors giving $50K each); no quid-pro-quo established.
Campaign-fund personal useno data
15% weight
—
No documented personal use of campaign or leadership-PAC funds found.
Revolving door & familyno data
15% weight
—
No documented family lobbying/contracts tied to office or staff-to-lobbyist pipeline found.

Sources behind this score: 1 data aggregator · 4 news reporting · 1 reference database. Score = weighted average of the components that have data; the 2 without sourced evidence are excluded, never counted against the member. Methodology →

Embed this score on your site

Updates automatically when the score changes.

Right of reply

Is something here wrong or missing context? Members and their staff can send a correction or a statement. Statements are published on this page in full, and corrections go in the public log. Email corrections@greederboard.com.