James Lankford
James Lankford (R-OK), a U.S. senator since 2015, has a comparatively modest financial profile: his disclosed holdings are dominated by a MidFirst Bank deposit and broad index ETFs (IVV, IJH), with no evidence of individual-stock trading subject to STOCK Act periodic transaction reporting. Quiver Quantitative estimates his net worth at roughly $795K (2025), ranking among the lower half of Congress, with no documented growth beyond ordinary salary and market gains. His top career donor industry is oil and gas (~$545K) with significant pro-Israel PAC support, a typical pattern for an Oklahoma Republican that constitutes correlation, not proof, of influence. No FEC personal-use complaints, family-lobbying ties, or notable absenteeism were found in available public records; on the metrics tested, his record appears clean and scores low.
Public record
- In Congress since
- 2011
- Committees
- Senate Select Committee on Ethics (Chairman)
Finance
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
Senate Select Committee on Intelligence - Missed votes, 119th Congress
- 0.7% (6 of 915; median member 1.9%)
- Campaign money, 2025–26 cycle
- $989K raised · 33% from PACs & committees · $2.8M cash on hand FEC ↗
The stock-trading ban
H.R. 7008 bans new stock purchases by members, spouses and dependents; it doesn't force sales of existing holdings. The Senate vote was on the version paired with the SAVE Act, which is why no Democrat voted yes. Full breakdown →
Disclosed stock trades
No periodic transaction reports on file since 2024. That's the norm: most members don't trade individual stocks, or hold them in blind trusts and diversified funds.
Amounts are the ranges members must report, not exact values. The STOCK Act requires a report within 45 days of a trade; "late" counts days past that deadline, measured to the filing date.
How the score breaks down
Sources behind this score: 4 data aggregator · 5 reference database · 1 official record. Score = weighted average of the components that have data; the 2 without sourced evidence are excluded, never counted against the member. Methodology →
Right of reply
Is something here wrong or missing context? Members and their staff can send a correction or a statement. Statements are published on this page in full, and corrections go in the public log. Email corrections@greederboard.com.