Greederboard
Official portrait of Lisa Blunt Rochester

Lisa Blunt Rochester

D Democrat · Senator, Delaware
5
Low self-dealing
4/6 components have data
#190 of 193 scored

Senator Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-DE), elected to the Senate in 2024 after four House terms, presents a clean self-dealing profile based on available public records. Her disclosed financial holdings consist exclusively of broad-based ETFs and index funds (AGG, SPY, VEA, IEMG) rather than individual company stocks, meaning the stock-trading component scores at zero — no individual-stock conflicts arise from diversified passive funds. She has a near-perfect voting attendance record (about 0.5% missed votes lifetime), and no public reporting surfaced regarding campaign-fund personal use, family lobbying, or revolving-door arrangements. Her campaign donor base is led by lawyers/law firms and largely Delaware-based interests; this is noted as correlation, not proof, and no specific donation-vote quid-pro-quo pattern was identified.

Public record

In Congress since
2017
Committees
Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs
Commerce, Science, and Transportation
Environment and Public Works
Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Missed votes, 119th Congress
0.7% (6 of 915; median member 1.9%)
Campaign money, 2025–26 cycle
$1.0M raised · 29% from PACs & committees · $121K cash on hand FEC ↗

The stock-trading ban

Senate cloture on H.R. 7008, Sep 30, 2026
No
Cosponsored a ban bill
S. 1879 S. 5320

H.R. 7008 bans new stock purchases by members, spouses and dependents; it doesn't force sales of existing holdings. The Senate vote was on the version paired with the SAVE Act, which is why no Democrat voted yes. Full breakdown →

Disclosed stock trades

No periodic transaction reports on file since 2024. That's the norm: most members don't trade individual stocks, or hold them in blind trusts and diversified funds.

Amounts are the ranges members must report, not exact values. The STOCK Act requires a report within 45 days of a trade; "late" counts days past that deadline, measured to the filing date.

How the score breaks down

Stock self-trading
25% weight
0
Disclosed holdings are exclusively broad-market ETFs and index funds (AGG, SPY, VEA, IEMG) — no individual-company stocks. Per rubric, no individual-stock trading = score 0. Aggregate trackers list ~$7.4M in 'trades,' but these reflect fund rebalancing/holdings, not single-name equities with committee-sector overlap.
Net-worth enrichment in office
15% weight
0
Estimated net worth ~$12M (2025), largely held in passive index funds whose growth tracks the broad market. No evidence of net-worth growth beyond salary plus normal market returns during tenure; pre-office wealth is not scored. Insufficient data to attribute any abnormal enrichment.
Money → action alignmentcorrelation, not proof of any quid-pro-quo
20% weight
15
CORRELATION, NOT PROOF. Top donor industry for her 2024 victory fund was lawyers/law firms ($75.4K), led by Delaware firm Young Conaway. Donor base is geographically/industry-concentrated in Delaware legal and corporate-services interests, but no specific aligned vote/bill quid-pro-quo was identified in public reporting. Low score reflects ordinary home-state concentration absent demonstrated vote linkage.
Campaign-fund personal useno data
15% weight
—
No public reporting, FEC enforcement action, or news coverage found indicating personal use of campaign or leadership-PAC funds. Absence is not penalized per rubric.
Revolving door & familyno data
15% weight
—
No public records found of family members lobbying tied to her office, office-linked contracts, or a notable staff-to-lobbyist pipeline. Absence is not penalized per rubric.
Skips the job to fundraise
10% weight
3
Strong attendance: missed only ~4 of 838 roll-call votes (0.5%) lifetime, better than the chamber median of 2.8%. Active campaign fundraising is normal for a 2024 cycle; no evidence of paid speeches or fundraising crowding out legislative duties. Minimal score for routine fundraising activity.

Sources behind this score: 3 data aggregator · 6 reference database · 1 official record. Score = weighted average of the components that have data; the 2 without sourced evidence are excluded, never counted against the member. Methodology →

Embed this score on your site

Updates automatically when the score changes.

Right of reply

Is something here wrong or missing context? Members and their staff can send a correction or a statement. Statements are published on this page in full, and corrections go in the public log. Email corrections@greederboard.com.